A+ R A-

News Wire

Feds Mean Business: U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade on Kilpatrick Indictments

E-mail Print PDF

By Bankole Thompson, Special to the NNPA from the Michigan Chronicle –

U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade visited the offices of the Michigan Chronicle for another sit-down interview with senior editor Bankole Thompson to discuss the recent indictments against former Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, his father, Bernard Kilpatrick, ex-top mayoral aide Derrick Miller, city contractor Bobby Ferguson and former Detroit Water and Sewage Department boss Victor Mercado.

MICHIGAN CHRONICLE: When you say this indictment brings an end to the investigation into the Kwame Kilpatrick inner circle, what do you mean?

BARBARA MCQUADE: Yes, I think so. One of the questions I get asked frequently is that we as a city are under such a cloud of suspicion, when is this going to end, when is there going to be such a closure? So I really felt that it was important to communicate that we hope this is the end for the health of the city. It is important that we can move forward. That people who want to do contracting with the City of Detroit feel confident that the culture of corruption is over.

You can never say we are not going to find any more cases. We have some little, other investigations going on. But in terms of the significant big case involving the Kilpatrick administration, this is it. I don’t want people to think that there is some another shoe yet to drop. I think it is very important to send that message. One of the things we talked about before was trying to bring a sense of urgency to this investigation so it could bring some closure. And, I’m hopeful that is what we have done.

MC: Did you feel rushed to announce these indictments because of reports that the term of the grand jury was set to soon expire?

BM: No. It is not uncommon to republish a case to a new grand jury so we would have done that if we needed to. But, we actually set the target date many months ago knowing what the grand jury schedule was. There were many witnesses who needed to come before the grand jury. And, so you know there are only so many hours of the day when you can get them in. So we came up with a timeline budget of how much time we needed to get everybody in before then.

They (grand jury) had one more week that they were sitting so we finished one week earlier. We were glad to do that. Although we wanted to push this case as quickly as possible, we also wanted to do it as thoroughly as possible. And, if we felt that we weren’t done and needed more time we certainly would have republished another grand jury.

MC: Thoroughly as possible means an 89-page indictment?

BM: Yeah it does. And, if you’ve read it I think it is thorough, detailed. Sometimes when indictments come out it just says “so and so committed extortion, bribery.” But, we thought in this instance it was very important both to apprise the defendants of precisely of what it is they are charged with so they can prepare defense at trial and also to let the community know this is exactly what these defendants are charged with.

But, it is a trick because if you make it (indictment pages) too long it’s not even digestible for a jury, so we worked pretty hard to get it as short as possible. You know that Mark Twain quote about “I’m sorry I wrote you such a long letter I didn’t have time to write a shorter one.” We actually did pare it down as best as we could and spent a lot of time to make it as concise as possible. But, it alleges some pretty sweeping corruption so it takes all those pages to detail every one of the schemes.

MC: Historically, the Rackateer Influenced and Corrupt Organzations Act (RICO) has been used to go after the mob, drug kingpins, etc. There are some who are suggesting that the use of RICO in the case against Kilpatrick and his cabal might be just another case of piling on. Is that the case?

BM: I thought RICO was the appropriate charge in this case. It goes after organizations that used the power of an organization to commit a variety of crimes over long periods of time called a pattern of racketeering activity. I thought this is precisely what we have here. We saw Kwame Kilpatrick use the mayor’s office and even his position as state representative as an avenue for corrupt acts to make money. He used it for bribery, extortion and to defraud donors, so we thought it was the appropriate tool for that. We use it sparingly. It requires approval by the Department of Justice in Washington which we obtained. We recognize it’s a powerful tool, but we thought it was appropriate for a case of this magnitude.

MC: Are you 100 percent confident you will win convictions on all of these charges?

BM: No, I will never be 100 percent confident of convictions.

MC: But are you very confident that you will win convictions?

BM: It is a strong case but certainly the decision about guilt or innocence is to be decided by a jury, which requires 12 strangers to agree unanimously beyond a reasonable doubt which is very standard and it should be.

But, we wouldn’t bring this case if we didn’t think we could succeed.

MC: Given that the fall of the Kilpatrick administration, has been so publicized in this area, how do you put together an unbiased jury?

BM: That would be a challenge. The question I’m sure the jurors would be asked between jury selection is not “Have you ever heard of them?” because no doubt everyone in this community, unless you’ve been hiding under a rock, has heard of them. And, if they haven’t we probably don’t want them to be juror because they aren’t engaged enough in the community.

The question would be, “In light of what you’ve heard and may have read, can you set that aside and decide this fairly based on the evidence that you hear in court and only on that evidence?”

My guess is there would be some very rigorous questioning of potential jurors. But, I’m confident we can find a fair jury in this community who would be able to decide the case based on the evidence they hear in court. My experience with juries is that they take their duties very seriously, they understand the magnitude of their decisions, the collective wisdom of the 12 people is great. I’m confident we can get a fair trial here.

MC: Why aren’t some of the contractors involved in the corruption that led to this latest round of indictments not indicted?

BM: Although it’s been a long time coming, there are some contractors who were convicted who are part of this. They were involved in some of the bribery scheme. Karl Kado, John Rutherford, James Rosendale, Rayford Jackson. There are four or five contractors who pled guilty and their conduct is included as part of this and their cooperation is likely to be a part of this case. In addition, there are other contractors who can probably be more properly characterized as victims. Based on our review of the evidence, we did not see evidence that would show that they were guilty of committing crimes, but more that they were coerced into participating in these contracts with Bobby Ferguson.

Certainly I supposed they went along with it. They were told ‘if you want to keep your contract these are the conditions’, and (they) went along with it. But, it’s a difficult thing to weigh when you crossed the line from being a victim to being someone who is complicit. But, no doubt we gave some people immunity in exchange for their cooperation. That’s the reality of these cases.

MC: How many people got immunity? Hundreds?

BM: I don’t think the number is 100 and I don’t know the answer.

MC: What role, if any, did Christine Beatty play in your investigations or was she given a free pass in exchange for cooperation?

BM: No, she wasn’t given a free pass. She is not someone we’ve ignored, but I guess I don’t want to comment beyond that.

MC: Its been reported that the pension board is under federal scrutiny. Is that the next shoe to drop?

BM: I don’t want to comment on that.

MC: Bernard Kilpatrick fired back before the indictments were released, saying basically that your office is lining up criminals to testify against him and his son. Does that affect the credibility of the witnesses that you are preparing?

BM: Well, I think we’ll see at trial what witnesses, who they are, what they will have to say. But as you can see from reading the indictments it’s not solely based on witness testimony. There is documented evidence as well. There are text messages as well. I am confident that the trial will show what our evidence is and that we’d be successful. But, it’s for a jury to decide.

MC: How sure are you that you will get a conviction?

BM: You know you can never speculate on that because everybody is entitled to a fair trial. There is all kinds of uncertainty in the trial process. It’s not something that typically we’ll give an opinion on. But we don’t bring a case like this unless we believe there is a reasonable likelihood of success at trial. That is the Department of Justice standard. We believe that standard has been satisfied and we are prepared to go forward.

We’ve lost these cases from time to time over the years. But, I don’t think you can be afraid to take one on just because you’ve lost in the past. They are hard cases. Show me a lawyer who has never lost a case and I’ll show you one who is afraid to take the hard ones. We’re willing to take them.

MC: How much in dollar amount would these prosecutions cost?

BM: I really can’t say. It’s difficult to quantify because we pay our people based on salary. If they weren’t working on this case they’d still be there. They’ll just be working on something else. I can’t think of a case that would be more important for them to spend their resources on and their time on. I think its been money well spent. But, no doubt if they haven’t spent the last six years working on this, they would worked on numerous other cases.

MC: Why did you feel the need to point out that Ayanna Kilpatrick and outgoing Congresswoman Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick were found to have done nothing wrong?

BM: Well, I was specifically asked that question. I didn’t volunteer it. You know sometimes people may assume guilt by association and there is no evidence in our indictment that they did anything wrong. So, I thought it was our obligation to answer that question.

MC: During our first interview you talked about mock trials you conduct to try out your cases. Is that what you did with these indictments?

BM: We did. We actually had two rounds of it. We had a small group that did the vetting of the case of indictments several weeks ago. Actually, we’ve done it at various stages. We’ve had several meetings on the case. And, then we had a very big one a week ago where some of the key people in the office came in and it lasted many hours, where we asked several questions, sorted our presentation - what’s the evidence on each of these schemes to make sure that it was solid and well vetted. I’m sure we’ll do it again before trial to make sure our strategy is sound and we anticipate all of the defenses we can think of.

MC: When you say you have hundreds of witnesses are you literary saying you that number of witnesses?

BM: Well, hundreds of witnesses were questioned. But, how many would actually be called for the trial I don’t know that number. Sometimes you talk to a witness and they don’t know anything. So, just because they were questioned doesn’t mean we’ll present them as a witness at trial. What that witness list will look like at trial we don’t know yet. We’ll have to see how that shapes out.

MC: Looking ahead into 2011, what would your focus be? Is it going to be public corruption, violent crime or the civil rights unit you created?

BM: Well, I’m hopeful that now that we’ve moved past this big case certainly we’ll have a lot of lawyers preparing for this trial and getting ready to go. Maybe we can turn our focus to help this city move forward. Our violent crime is a very important thing. We are hoping to do some very exciting things in civil rights. We have some very good cases and some very good investigations pending. We want to do a lot more outreach in terms of civil rights, let people know what we have available. So, we’ve been already meeting with some community groups and civil rights groups so when people feel like their civil rights are violated they know that we are available and we are here to help.

Also protecting the rights of immigrants is very important when we think about the vibrancy of our communities. Everything we do at our office my question is, “Will this improve the quality of life for the citizens of the Eastern District of Michigan?” And, I think making it a place where immigrants feel welcomed to live and do business is a very important part of what we do. So, civil rights is a very important part of that too.

MC: What kind of feedback have you gotten so far since you took over as U.S. Attorney?

BM: It’s a lot of positive feedback.

MC: In light of these indictments?

BM: (Laughs) In light of these indictments, mostly very positive feedback. But, you know maybe the critics don’t tell me. But, I think its been positive. I’ve had strangers shake my hand on the street. But, those who are unhappy are probably too polite to say.

MC: What’s the relationship now between your office and the Middle Eastern/Muslim community in light of the death of Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah who was killed by federal agents?

BM: I think our relationship with the Middle Eastern community is positive. It’s a relationship we worked hard on because I think that’s another area we are having trust in government. I’m sure there are those who are not satisfied with the report from the Department of Justice that reviewed the issue and concluded that it was justified. But, that aside, we have some defendants in that case whose cases are pending so I can’t talk too much about that.

But I will tell you that relations with the Middle Eastern community is something I worked very hard on because it’s a very important part of our community. I’m their U.S. Attorney too. I want that community to feel welcomed. I don’t want them to feel that they are under suspicion merely because of who they are. I worked very hard to explain to them that our cases are based on conduct and not on people’s religion, ethnicity or national origin.

But it’s understandable to feel under fire. Since 9-11 there has been a lot of backlash against Arabs and Muslim Americans, so we worked very hard to offer them the help of our civil rights unit as well as just reaching out and answering their questions and be accountable to them for our actions.

MC: What about the Aiyana Jones situation? Still being monitored by the Justice Department?

BM: Yes. The Michigan State Police is investigating and so we are sort of standing by and keeping track of what’s going and to see if that’s resolved satisfactorily. We’ll wait for that process to conclude.

MC: What’s been the response to the town hall meeting on crime you hosted recently at Rev. Edgar Vann’s church? BM: We had maybe a little over 100 people there on a very cold night when the schools were closed. In light of the weather, I was pleased with how many people came out. One of the things we are trying to do is try to attack violent crime. We created a new violent crime unit in part because we know how strapped our state and local resources are. Prosecutors have had layoffs, the police departments have downsized. So, we’ve been trying to help with that effort.

But we’ve also joined forces and we put together this group that’s called the Comprehensive Violence Reduction Partnership. Its got Detroit Police, FBI, Michigan State Police, the Wayne County Prosecutor, the Wayne County Sheriff, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and certainly we are doing a lot together on the enforcement side. If we all have scarce resources, if we can come together and talk about how to use those most efficiently we think that’s a better way to serve the community.

We can’t just arrest our way out of our violent crime problem. History shows that’s just not working and we still have a lot of violent crime. We’ve made lots of arrests. One of the things we’ve been trying to do with this series of town hall meetings is to get out and talk to members of the community, tell them that we need their help, that we can’t do this without them. To get that kind of help, I think we need to earn public trust.

MC: Do you feel that you are gaining that public trust?

BM: I’m hopeful that we are. The meetings we’ve had have been very positive and the citizens who come say that they are fed up with crime. They want to help. They want to know how they can get involved with block clubs, neighborhood watch. The people who come out to a town hall meeting are probably the people who are interested in helping. The ones who don’t come are probably the audience we need to reach even more. We did one in northwest Detroit, Southwest Detroit, the east side recently that just by getting out people may talk to their neighbors and we can find ways to build some trust there. We need citizens to feel confident that when they report a crime that there will be response. We need people to feel like they can trust the police. This sort of no-snitch mentality…people fear the police and we want to show a face that they can trust and being accountable to the public. That is what we are trying to do.

MC: Given what allegedly transpired between former mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and the former Justice Department police monitor Sheryl Robinson Wood, what kind of challenge does that present for both the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Detroit Police Department in terms of moving forward and addressing inherent problems within the police department?

BM: Having the problems that we had with the previous monitor who had to leave because of her own conflict of interest was certainly a big setback for us. We now have a new monitor in place and I’m confident that the new monitor and his team are doing good work and have actually made some progress. In the past year they went from (a) compliance rate of 20 percent to 60 percent. They are showing progress and that I think is something that should give us reason for optimism.

Wesley Snipes Supporters Demanding Retrial

E-mail Print PDF

By Gregory Dale, Special to the NNPA from the AFRO-American Newspapers –

Following the federal imprisonment of actor Wesley Snipes on a three-year sentence for failure to file income tax returns, a collection of celebrities, politicians, friends, and supporters are demanding the actor receive a fair trial.

A group calling itself The Friends of Wesley Snipes is pushing a petition for the famous actor in order to bring awareness to perceived misconduct during his trial. Spearheading the movement is Snipes' wife Nicky and a laundry list of celebrities and supporters including the Rev. Al Sharpton, Denzel Washington, Judge Joe Brown, among thousands of other supporters.

According to CNN, Snipes reported to a Pennsylvania federal prison camp on Dec. 9, 2010 for not filing tax returns in 1999, 2000 and 2001. Though Snipes initially faced felony charges of tax fraud and conspiracy, those charges were later dropped and Snipes was charged with misdemeanor violations.

Prosecutors argued that Snipes had received $40 million since 1999, but had not completed tax returns and was involved in a tax resisters group. The actor denied his involvement and said his failure to file was due to a mistake by his financial advisor.

The Friends of Snipes contend on their website that, in addition to Snipes unfairly receiving the maximum sentence of three years in prison on misdemeanor charges, he was denied an appeal. Additionally, the group claims that two jurors from the Snipes trial sent out e-mails explaining that three other jurors presumed that Snipes was guilty before the trial began. In their e-mails, the two jurors claimed the remaining jurors, in rendering their verdict, never believed that Snipes would be sent to jail, and felt they needed to come forward to show misconduct.

But Judge Hodges, who issued Snipes' sentence, declined to interview the jurors to confirm any misconduct and issue the actor a new trial.

Snipes' lawyer, attorney Daniel Meachum, said a brief for Snipes' appeal will be submitted this month and the petition is slated to be submitted to the Supreme Court in February.

"It's not so much a case about Wesley Snipes, but it's a case about the judicial process right now," Meachum told the AFRO during a recent interview. "This case is about the everyday man. Wesley Snipes is actually just a vessel because there's a bunch of people—Black and White—who have been incarcerated when they don't necessarily need to be there, because the prosecution has not turned over all the discoveries [evidence] that they're required to do. Wesley's just one of many victims in this system."

Former NY Governor Paterson Reflects on His Tenure

E-mail Print PDF

Special to the NNPA from the New York Amsterdam News –

Reported Cyril Josh Barker, Nayaba Arinde and Curtis Simmons
Written by Cyril Josh Barker

As the final days of the historic New York Governor David Paterson administration come to a close, the outgoing governor sat down with several members of the Amsterdam News staff to reflect on his term as governor.

Paterson faced unprecedented challenges, including one of the worst economic climates in the history of the state and nation, and an often hostile press corps, which openly and consistently questioned his legitimacy and competence.

But despite the obstacles he faced, Paterson was upbeat about his future and the future of the State. As he mulled over his governorship, he said that, first and foremost, he wanted to be remembered as one of the first political actors in the country to identify the economic crisis, and begin the process of asking for shared sacrifices. And, as he addressed the fiscal crisis, Paterson said he always kept in the front of his mind where he came from and the people who have made his political life a possibility. But, he also knew that he had to deal with overwhelming challenges. Paterson’s goal was to keep the state from crumbling into a financial disaster similar to Illinois and California.

“To come in the midst of this economic downturn and crisis was prohibitive then to have problems with leadership in the legislature, I think there was a perception that I had changed,” he said. “But I didn’t change, my circumstances changed. If I didn’t manage the way I did, the state would have become insolvent.”

It was a little less than three years ago that Paterson took over the job as New York State’s governor, making history as the state’s first Black governor, and the first legally blind governor in United States history to serve for more than a few days.

Looking back on his journey as governor, he recalls his greatest achievements being the enhancement in opportunities for minority- and women-owned businesses (MWMBEs). Paterson believes the increased tax revenues from those businesses, in the long run, will lead to replacing lost manufacturing jobs with biotech, research, broadband and clean renewable energy opportunities.

Under his leadership he diligently worked to keep New York off of the list of 20 states that were in financial distress. And, despite the odds, and more than a decade of Republican mismanagement under the stewardship of “the empty suit” Gov. George Pataki, New York has weathered the turbulent climate better than most big states. However, many mainstream media outlets let his accomplishments go unnoticed. On a regular basis Paterson was on the receiving end of aggressive and hostile reporting, which often focused on unsubstantiated rumors about his personal life and peripheral aspects of his governing style.

“What the media wants to write about and the truth are very far apart,” he said. “They are willing to lecture public servants about the truth. If you read the stories, they are in a lockstep. If one media outlet writes something, no matter how wrong it is, they don’t refute it. When that goes on in politics, that’s called cronyism.”

Paterson got a taste of “editorial cronyism” in February 2010 when rumors circulated that the New York Times had a story about his involvement in a scandal—similar to his predecessor Elliot Spitzer—that supposedly included both womanizing and drug use. The so called “paper of record” never released a story substantiating the rumors, but the rumors swirled around the press, peaking last February with gossip that Paterson was going to be forced to resign. On reflection, Paterson says he would have handled it differently.

“What I should have done was the opposite,” he said. “I should have lured the media in, not answer any questions and made it look like it was true and gotten on stage and said, ‘Good morning, if you are looking for a resignation you are looking for the wrong office. The reason you are here isn’t because of any facts or legitimate sources. You are here because of a bunch of lies, innuendo, and made-up stories. So because you wasted the trip, I will give you a story: I’m running for re-election.’”

Even after the rumors proved to be false, Paterson continued to get beaten up by the White-controlled media. Paterson said that most of the stories written about him were for profit instead of personal. Referred to as the “accidental governor,” he said that his race did play a role in his treatment.

“It’s the first elevation of an African-American to a major post in public service in this country. To me this confirmed backlash in diversity. If you are elected, there’s nothing anyone can say—but this little blind Black person became governor, and no one knows who he is, and he’s probably just a political hack who they put on the ticket to get some Black votes. I was treated as someone who was not serious,” he said.

Being Black played a role in several of his accomplishments as governor that ultimately benefited all racial groups, including better polices for MWBEs, reforming the Rockefeller Drug Laws, and stopping officers from being promoted because they successfully filled their stop-and-frisk quotas.

“These are remedies that wouldn’t have existed if I hadn’t become governor,” he said. “I had to take a little heat to do it, but I did it with honor.”

As far as the state budget is concerned, he admits that balancing it has hurt a lot of people, however, there’s been more good than bad. For example, healthcare allocation for the poor was raised for the first time in 20 years, and food stamps and homeless shelters were expanded under his leadership. And, true to form, Paterson received his harshest criticism from big media and their sycophant commentators when he taxed the rich.

“We did take actions that hurt people, but what we tried to do was to share the sacrifice. Twelve billion dollars would have been balanced on the backs of some people. The distance between the rich and the poor is the greatest it’s ever been. The recession has been so deep that if you’re unemployed, you don’t really care if the rich are sacrificing, you are still sharing in the sacrifice,” he said.

As for the state’s future, Paterson said that his successor, Governor-elect Andrew Cuomo, has a good sense of what he needs to do to get the state out of the economic crisis. Paterson is also confident about Cuomo’s diversity in his administration. However, as the saga of the state budget continues, and after a shift of power in the State Senate, Cuomo has his work cut out for him.

Paterson said, “No matter who the governor is, the real question is if the state is governable. I think that in crisis you need one leader. The problem with the economic crisis was that you had too many processes trying to address it. I’d like to suggest to the new governor and the new legislators that they work out a system where the government could declare a state of emergency, as they can and did in New Jersey, but can’t here in New York.”

And as he contemplates these last issues, Paterson seems quite satisfied with his tenure overseeing the Empire State. He has capped a more than 20-year career in public service by holding the highest public office in the state—surprising for those who do not know well this remarkable man, but what was often expected from a son of Harlem. He sees his future in continuing to work to help New York State develop renewable energy, teaching, or some form of media. And, one can be assured that he will bring vigor and good humor to the next stage of his life, which he revealed includes writing his memoirs.

Africa Races to Catch the Internet Wave

E-mail Print PDF

Special to the NNPA from the Global Information Network –

Five new cables on the continent—worth $2.5 billion – are bringing increasing speeds at lower prices for Africa’s internet-hungry population with user growth in the last decade up by 2000 percent!

The International Telecommunication Union projects 5.3 billion cell phone owners by the end of this year. "The mobile phone revolution continues," says a U.N. report charting the phenomenon that has transformed commerce, healthcare and social lives across the planet. Mobile phone leases in Africa rose from 54 million to almost 350 million between 2003 and 2008, the quickest growth in the world.

“Tremendous progress has been made in the adoption and use of information and communication technologies,” declared Dr Hamadoun I. Toure, head of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) at a conference last summer.

“What is most interesting to me,” Toure said, “and what highlights the critical role of connectivity in Africa – is that once people have access to information technologies, they don’t give it up, even when their social or economic situation changes. Put simply, Africans want to stay connected, and they work hard to make sure they stay connected.”

Toure continued: “In Africa, we are seeing new broadband capacity coming on-stream fast, and I was delighted to be personally present in Kenya in March when a new submarine cable was brought onshore, and then to be in French Guiana earlier this month to see new satellites for Africa being launched.

"These are truly inspirational events, and signs of the very positive times in which we live.”

Donna Brazile Keynote Speaker At Airports Economic Forum

E-mail Print PDF

By Othor Cain, Special to the NNPA from The Mississippi Link –

Democratic Strategist Donna Brazile concluded her busy travel year of lectures, speaking engagements, and personal appearances in Jackson, Mississippi, as she keynoted the Airport Minority Advisory Council (AMAC)/American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) Economic Forum.

The forum, in its 17th year, is designed to keep its membership abreast of current information about legislation and regulatory changes affecting the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concessions and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) Program. “It is our job to keep our membership informed, and this forum serves as that vehicle to do so,” said Don O’Bannon, chair of AMAC. “We make sure those in our organization are equipped with knowledge and have the necessary tools to succeed.”

Brazile, who serves as a regular contributor on CNN and ABC news stations and also spent 200 days on the road in 2010, said she knew a thing or two about airports. “Just within the last couple of weeks I have been to Columbia, S.C., Salt Lake City, Dallas, Austin, Houston, and San Antonio. And, I want to thank all of you for what you do to make my travel experiences good,” said Brazile. “The jobs you do to provide support services, safety, shopping, and eating to the millions of Americans that fly daily is unparalleled.”

According to AMACs website, it is the only national, non-profit, trade association dedicated to promoting the full participation of minority-owned, women-owned and disadvantaged business enterprises (MW/DBEs) in airport contracting, and the inclusion of minorities and women participation in the airport industry and to capitalize on the opportunities available in the multi-billion dollar industry. “We understand that doing business with small businesses is good business,” an excited O’Bannon told The Mississippi Link. “Participants leave this economic forum with a very healthy potential to do business with airports while also securing a strong base of network support.”

Brazile took advantage of her bully pulpit and talked politics. “Ladies and gentlemen, if you think things were gridlocked in our nation’s capitol before 2008 then I suggest you buckle up because 2011 and 2012 will be gridlocked years like you’ve never seen before,” said Brazile. “What happened during the mid-term elections was just another way of folk wanting to see the policies of this administration fail.”

Brazile acknowledged that some Democrats are a little weary of President Obama after his recent compromise with Republican leaders to continue the tax cuts initiated under former President George W. Bush. “We cannot lose faith; our President (Obama) is a very smart man and is an amazing thinker,” she said. “I can only imagine that some of the compromises that were made were because Republicans held so many things hostage in that bill and at the end of the day the president was looking out for the American people especially those that have so little. This was the only way for him (Obama) to continue the unemployment benefits that so many Americans are using.”

Brazile, a New Orleans native and former campaign manager/director for Gore 2000, also acknowledged the role Mississippi played during Hurricane Katrina. “My family relocated here for about six weeks after the storm hit, and I am grateful for all of you and all that this state did during that devastation,” said Brazile. “That is why since then and even today, I continue to scream and fight for full recovery and full compensation for this state. The Mississippi Gulf Coast was hit hard and you deserve your fair share.”

Page 271 of 336

Quantcast

BVN National News Wire