A+ R A-

More Commentary

Letter to Dr. Joseph Bailey

E-mail Print PDF

Dr. Bailey,

I have been working with many other individuals and groups for the past 2 years to Abolish Physical/Corporal Punishment of children in Schools, already ILLEGAL in Schools in 30 States. I am unable to protect my own 3 children (whom we do not hit) from witnessing/overhearing teachers threaten/hit students with wooden paddles to deliberately inflict physical pain and suffering to Punish them for minor infractions such as not turning in homework, etc. Tennessee State Law does NOT require Parental Consent of Notification for children to by physically punished in Schools.

Federal and State Government officials have informed us that the very important matter of our children's health and safety in schools in left up to autonomous school district governing boards.

We made a written/verbal presentation in April 2008 to our school district board members during "National Child Abuse Prevention and Awareness Month" to demand the Prohibit Physical/Corporal Punishment of Children in our Schools and they have not responded, they have IGNORED US!

I have collected several news articles of children suffering injuries due to paddling in school. One news headline reads "Nearly 60,000 Spanking in Miss. Schools last year" and Leflore County, Miss. was sued twice in one month for $500,000 each time by families of elementary school children injured by paddling. Our nation's most trusted Children's Health and Education Organizations have issued official positions statements Opposing Corporal Punishment of Children in Schools. Government Officials continue to IGNORE Research that indicates Corporal Punishment is harmful to children and contributes to social ills.

A federal lawsuit was filed 2/22/2010 in Miss. to ban paddling in schools which also seeks a declaration that Corporal Punishment of Children in Schools in Unconstitutional.

The Coalition Against School Paddling filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights against the 20 School Paddling States.

Recent news headlines read "Girls Spanked, Suspended for Skimpy Prom Dresses" at Oxford High School, Alabama and "Stopping bullying before it starts" related that elementary school children in Kennett, MO are punished for bullying by being hit with wooden paddles to deliberately inflict physical pain and suffering as Punishment known as Corporal Punishment or Paddling or by being suspended.

Hitting children in schools to Punish them is NOT the answer! U.S. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) plans to introduce legislation in U.S. Congress to ban the use of physical discipline in public schools.

At a recent hearing by the Healthy Families and Communities Subcommittee, McCarthy said:

The federal government has outlawed physical punishment in prisons, jails and medical facilities. Yet our children sitting in a classroom are targets for hitting. We know safe, effective, evidence-based strategies are available to support children who display challenging behaviors in school settings.

Hitting children in school does not help them achieve academic success.

Hitting children in school is not an effective discipline tactic. Hitting children in school does not make them feel safe in school. Instead, they feel humiliated, helpless, depressed, and angry. Hitting children teaches them that it is a legitimate way to handle conflict.

We are adults. We shouldn’t be hitting kids in schools. Instead, we, as a nation, should move toward these positive strategies when it comes to our school children.

It has been a 150 years since the first state banned this practice in schools. Since then, 29 states have done the same. But it is still occurring every day in our nation and we still have hundreds of thousands of students being hit in our schools.

Julie Worley

Immigration, Drugs and Race

E-mail Print PDF

(NNPA) The term Immigration is very broad and misunderstood. Recently, it is being applied to Mexicans crossing the formal US/Mexico border to settle or to temporarily work in the United States. This is quite a bit different than Europeans coming to the New World to settle and begin a new life. It is quite different than Asians coming to meet the work demand in a new and vibrant nation. Also, it pales in difference to Africans, South Americans and Caribbeans coming to start a new life.

We must look at the historical perspective when it comes to Mexicans (let’s not use the term Hispanic).

The states of California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas were a part of the sovereignty of Mexico until we, the United States, violently stole this gigantic piece of real estate from the nation. In two acts, Texas Revolution (1836) and the Mexican-American War (1848) we made, without provocation, one of the biggest land grabs in the history of the world.

There are more than a few Mexican Americans who can take their heritage back to the 1500’s. Yet, our press and common opinion want to think of them collectively as “immigrants”. A lot of the movement from one side of the border to the other is simply family interaction.

But our press and political dogma spews something quite different.

After stealing Texas via rebelling US settlers (immigrants), our nation quickly annexed it into our Republic. We then encouraged mass migration to populate and fortify the state.

After the Mexican-American War, we propped up the California Gold Rush in 1849 to stimulate mass migration into our newly stolen lands. So it is with great irony that we condemn Mexicans crossing over into land that was once theirs and where many of their relatives settled into centuries ago. This is more than about immigration.

Most Mexican immigrants, legal or illegal, are hard working, family oriented persons. Their mission is to make a living through the “sweat of their brows”. It is the Judeo-Christian Work Ethic at its best. Yet, we want to paint an ugly picture as though they are criminal and immoral.

Now, let’s get to the real problem.

What is happening in Arizona is the fact that many of the borders crossing pathways of the Southwestern US have been effectively sealed. For some reason the federal government has put up fences along the Mexican border everywhere but in Arizona. Thus, the flow of the migration is coming up through Arizona like the water flow of the Mississippi River. Federal policy makers know this but try to act “brain dead” on the matter and will not address strengthening the Arizona/Mexico border with fencing as they have done in California, New Mexico and Texas.

With the folks seeking work crossing over comes the myriad of drug traffickers.

The violence and pain is coming from the drug traffickers and the ignorant and/or racist pundants seem to mix them into one big bag with the immigrants seeking a better life.

The state legislature and Governor of Arizona have just passed a very unfortunate law that will fan the flames of racism and bigotry. However, I understand why this is happening. They are frustrated. Crime in Arizona caused by border crossings is skyrocketing.

Ranchers are being shot for apparently no reason other than inspecting their lands. Murders in Arizona cities is at an all time high and this is caused by warring drug gangs.

Phoenix has become the World Capital for Kidnapping. Imagine an American city with that distinction! The citizens of Arizona are frightened and demand action from government. The border is the responsibility of the federal government but it has been derelict of its precious duty. Thus, the state government of Arizona, in its frustration, has decided to do something even if it may be wrong. It will wake up the federal government and induce some kind of responsible action. The big problem here is not immigration but the lack of government policing drug trafficking. The lack of policing drug activity or the cooperation of it is what’s wrong here. In no way can you tell me that drugs can come into this nation like falling rain without government cooperation. Our justice authorities are the best in the world and they act incompetent when it comes to reducing the amount of drug importation into this nation.

There is an immense amount of money, hundreds of billions of dollars annually, and corruption is well settled in. So, the “thought police” want you to think that all the crime erupting in Arizona is because of impoverish immigrants flowing into the nation with the thought of committing crime as opposed to looking for work or uniting with their families. Those with racial animus are too quickly to buy this. Don’t you buy it.

Alford is the co-founder, President/CEO, of the National Black Chamber of Commerce®. Website: www.nationalbcc.org. Email: halford@nationalbcc.org.

Bill O’Reilly’s Obsession with "Playing the Race Card"

E-mail Print PDF

By A. Peter Bailey, NNPA Commentary –

(NNPA) So-called conservatives in this country spend much of their time accusing Black folks of “playing the race card” when practically any comment is made about expressions of white supremacy. The leader of the conservative mantra on this subject is Fox “fair and balanced” Cable News’ reigning propagandist, Bill O’Reilly.

On his television program and in his newspaper column, O’Reilly regularly scolds those whom he considers “playing the race card.” In a recent column he pontificated about speaking to a gathering of Al Sharpton’s National Action Network during which he told the attendees that “…branding the tea party as a racist group would be a huge mistake that could actually create racism….”

Though calling the tea party gang and their supporters such as O’Reilly “racist” may be a mistake calling them White supremacists is right on target. A survey conducted at the University of Michigan on what Blacks and Whites consider to be “integration” backs up this description. Black, according to the survey, regards integration as 50 percent Black, 50 percent White with a Black or White person in charge.

For Whites, it is 15 percent Black, 85 percent White with a White person always in charge. That is a White supremacist position probably shared by most tea partiers and their journalistic supporters. That’s why they regard the Obamas being in the White House as an abomination, a serious violation of the natural order of the universe.

A Black person who points out this fact of life is “playing the race card,” according to O’Reilly, a charge, by the way, he never hurls at Whites. He didn’t accuse Newt Gingrich of “playing the race card” when, prior to passage of the health reform bill, Newt reportedly said the Democrats who voted for the bill “will have destroyed their party, such as Lyndon Johnson did for 40 years.”

Nor did he hurl race card playing accusations at Investor’s Business Daily for saying that the bill “is affirmative action on steroids, deciding everything from who becomes a doctor to who gets treatment on the basis of skin color.” When his buddy and obnoxious side-kick Glenn Beck lied that “Obama hates White people” and when a tea partier’s sign proclaimed that “Obama Plans White Slavery,” there wasn’t a mumbling word from O’Reilly about “playing the race card.”

A knowledgeable Black person doesn’t expect any such response from O’Reilly and his fellow propagandists.

We just have to be aware of what such toxic flacks are saying, writing and doing so we won’t be caught off guard when one or more of their feverish followers make a move against us. Of course, in doing this we, not the Whites, in O’Reilly’s view will be “creating racism.”

Journalist/Lecturer A. Peter Bailey, a former associate editor of Ebony, is currently editor of Vital Issues: The Journal of African American Speeches. He can be reached at apeterb@verizon.net.

Decisive Actions Lead To Results

E-mail Print PDF

On March 9, 2010, the state announced the names of schools ranked in the lowest five percent for academic achievement in the state. These schools will require substantial changes to their school year, governance, and funding. Among the schools named, 11 are a part of the San Bernardino City Unified School District.

Our community should know San Bernardino City Schools had already taken decisive actions at all of the schools on this new state list, prior to the creation of the list. In fact, most of the schools listed have made great progress in the last two to three years due to these decisive actions. We have aggressively added new leadership at most of these schools as well as provided additional training and material for teachers. We have provided teacher and administrator coaches and academic specialists, restructured academic offerings, and replaced weak programs with strong ones. The results have been positive and in some cases even spectacular!

District wide, our test scores have shown great gains over the course of the last six years. Six years ago 85 percent of the schools in San Bernardino were scoring in the 500 point range or lower in the Academic Performance Index (API). Today, almost 50 percent of our schools score in the 700-900 point ranges.

We have the highest scoring middle school at Richardson PREP HI. Middle College High School is among the highest scoring high schools in the county. We have almost doubled our career path programs for high school students. Our dropout rate is showing the steepest decline in the county, and our innovative programs and student interventions have earned the District numerous awards both at the state and national levels. All of this was accomplished in spite of declining enrollment, a weak economy, and the largest budget cuts to public schools since the Great Depression.

We believe that the state should take a new approach to support our local efforts, including funding sources that can be counted on from year to year and includes greater flexibility on how the funds can be used. Greater partnerships must be created between districts, businesses and city offices in order to maximize our resources and services for local families struggling with major economic and social obstacles that are unique to our community.

Education must be everyone’s priority because our children represent the future vitality of the community in which we live. Parents must become active partners and our teachers and administrators must not be villanized every time a new state program is rolled out.

It is important that we act decisively and quickly to address our latest challenges, and this is precisely what San Bernardino City Schools has done and will continue to do. We do expect that all of our schools will continue to improve as measured by the state’s measurement systems.

But, more importantly, we expect that our schools will be a great place for children to learn.

Dr. Arturo Delgado is Superintendent of the San Bernardino City Unified School District, the seventh largest in California, serving more than 53,000 students in the San Bernardino and Highland communities.

Keeping Taxes Local is Good Policy

E-mail Print PDF

We had an opportunity to keep tax dollars generated in South Mead Valley, Wagon Wheel, Good Hope, Meadowbrook, and Warm Springs, in those communities, and thanks to the support of the residents and property owners, we did it!

Working with the leaders in these areas who sit on the Perris Valley Municipal Advisory Council and after holding numerous meetings in all five communities over the past 15 months, we had a good idea of what the resident’s wants and needs are, as well as services they asked us to provide with their tax dollars.

We will begin redirecting those tax dollars in June 2011, for public safety facilities, public health services, road paving, flood prevention and draining improvements, parks, community centers, and housing rehabilitation programs. These improvements to the community won’t happen overnight, but we will do this the old fashioned way, by saving those tax dollars for use on these improvements over time. During this 15 month process we also heard from the community about what they did not want.

They love the rural lifestyle, peace, tranquility, and solitude that these communities offer their residents and we all agree that should be preserved. We won’t be adding street lights which residents are concerned might impact Mount Palomar Observatory. We will not have wholesale plans to add sidewalks, street lights, and traffic signals either. This process is ongoing and we will work with the residents and property owners over the weeks, months, and years ahead to determine what they want first and when we do it. Make no mistake, not everyone is going to be happy but you have my word to listen and make the decisions based on what you have to say and what is in the best interest of the people who live there. Keeping tax dollars generated in a local community is not a new concept.

My colleagues and I on the Board of Supervisors have transformed our districts using local tax dollars in the communities that produced them. By using similar programs across the county we have added new services. These new facilities have included: fire stations, libraries, child care centers, senior centers and parks; repaired roads, and built new ones. We have also added youth activity centers, family resource centers, and even boxing clubs. Along the way we have installed new sewer lines, water lines, protected your drinking water, and improved access to medical care through health and dental clinics. These funds have been used to clean up our communities and illegal dumping sites and removed unsightly and unwanted graffiti.

Keeping tax dollars in the community in which they are generated is good public policy. So is seeking the advice of the people I have the honor and privilege to represent.

Supervisor Marion Ashley represents District 5. He is chairman of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors.

Page 78 of 90

Quantcast

BVN National News Wire