A+ R A-

Trayvon Martin Shooting and Verdict: My First Reaction

E-mail Print PDF

Share this article with a friend

When I first heard of the shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman I thought of when I had a conversation with my son when he was attending San Bernardino High School. It was in the late eighties and two gangs, Crips and Bloods were active and our police were on high alert. It was not a safe community and I wanted to make sure when he left for school that he also returned safely.

The conversation centered on him wanting to wear his red tennis shoes and red sweater, which was the school color, and he was the school mascot of Johnny Cardinal. He had every right as a citizen, student, and supporter of his school colors to wear the clothes but from my history and experience of being a Black male in America, I had to say, “you have every right but you being a Black male, I cannot let you wear that.”

It is so sad that our forefathers fought and died in every war from fighting the British to establish the country, civil war north and south to keep it together, World Wars I and II to keep us free, not to mention clearing the land, planting the fields, harvesting the crops, building the cities and the White House only to be treated and valued less than animals.

Michael Vick, a Black male professional football player in 2007 was implicated in a dog-fighting ring and served 20-months in prison. According to the records no dogs were killed, which in my mind puts a higher value on dogs than it does Black males in America.

We had a Black female, Marissa Alexander, stand her ground in her house by firing a pistol at the roof when her husband confronted her, and she was found guilty and is serving 20-years in the Florida prison system. She had a court restraining order against him so she had a right to defend herself but the justice system in Florida gets the results its wants against Blacks.

In the Trayvon case, Trayvon had every right to be where he was as did Zimmerman.

Zimmerman decided to profile Trayvon as a suspicious suspect just because of his experience of a White neighbors home being broken into several weeks before. Zimmerman profiled Trayvon as being “up to no good” just because of his color and the clothes he wore. Zimmerman decided to follow Trayvon around the neighborhood, which provoked Trayvon to believe his life was in jeopardy. Trayvon ran and Zimmerman followed even after being told by the police to stay in your car do not follow him. Zimmerman followed and when confronted by Trayvon and was losing the ensued fight, he pulled his gun and killed Trayvon. Then claimed he was standing his ground and killed Trayvon in self-defense.

Another thing that irked me was the police believed Zimmerman and did not arrest him until a fuss was made. Zimmerman was innocent in their eyes without a complete investigation.

People are saying that we had a trial and six people gave a verdict of not guilty. I remember another trial that was held over two thousands years ago that was a set up trial to get a verdict of guilty. So even though people receive a trial does not mean justice is served and it was not served in the Zimmerman trial.

In my opinion it is sad that Black males cannot feel free in their own country. It is sad that we have to teach our children they cannot behave in the same manner as White children. It is sad that we cannot “stand our ground to defend ourselves” when confronted by a White man in America. It is sad that we have to tell our children they are second class citizens in America.

Trayvon did not have to die because he did nothing wrong and that is why we will have to teach our children to act differently if we want them to come home alive.

Add comment

By using our comment system, you agree to not post profane, vulgar, offensive, or slanderous comments. Spam and soliciting are strictly prohibited. Violation of these rules will result in your comments being deleted and your IP Address banned from accessing our website in the future. Your e-mail address will NOT be published, sold or used for marketing purposes.

Security code


0 # krista 2013-10-04 05:26
If a black adult male had followed a white teenage boy and subsequently shot him during an ensuing fight that the white boy was winning, the jury would've believed the white boy a victim, that he had been afraid for his life and only sought to protect himself. No law would have prevented the jury from finding some type of criminal negligence leading to the white boy's death as a victim of the black man's predatory behavior. After all, he'd been told by a lawful authority not to follow.

Whether it had been negligence due to stalking/harassing a minor, not following police instructions, interfering with the quiet enjoyment of a U.S. citizen, whatever you want to call it, the white boy's murder would not go unpunished.

Now, we have Zimmerman's wife claiming on broadcast television that he threatened to pull a gun on her by reaching for his waistband during a recent argument.
My heart aches.
+2 # Chris B 2013-07-18 13:52
The issue with this case is that the prosecution could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that George Zimmerman did not kill Trayvon Martin in self defense. I blame the prosecution for the lack of persuasion. Regardless of any opinions, the jury was not persuaded to render a guilty conviction. Right or wrong, that is what happened and a jury's decision will always leave one party that the feeling that justice was not served.

I make no other judgement on the case, but it is known and accepted that the burden of proof is on the prosecution.

BVN National News Wire