A+ R A-

Hardy L. Brown

President Obama Set the Right Tone for Leadership

E-mail Print PDF

President Barack Obama went on the hill to the House of Representatives for the third time to deliver his State of the Union Address to the people of America. I noticed something different in him that was not in his previous two addresses. If you remember the first time out, someone yelled from the congressional galley “you are a liar”. Obama carried on with his speech as though nothing had happened but the whole world knew it was disrespectful for a congressperson to heckle the president. Yet Obama went on trying to work across the aisles with a group of people who did not want to work with him. The second year, congress was even more determined to not work with him as the “tea party people” dug in their heels led by Congressman Eric Cantor of Virginia; who took the position don’t work with President Obama on any issues. Their motto “Make Obama a one-term President” at all costs even if the country comes to a stand still.

I saw in President Obama’s posture and tone a confidence with or without you, I am going to lead this country for the good of the people. You can call me names like ‘food stamp president” like Newt Gingrich has in order to motivate the racially conscious people of his political party that cannot stand Obama. You can make fun of Black Americans who have helped build and protect this country like the Red Tail Tuskegee Airmen of World War II, yet I am going to lead.

His tone and message was: there is something wrong when a billionaire like Warren Buffet pays less taxes than his salaried secretary. There is something wrong in America when Wall Street millionaires mess up the country’s finances, sending millions of middle class citizens into poverty, get a bailout by the remaining taxpayers and do not want government to regulate them.

There is something wrong in America when we pay or give tax breaks to corporations for taking jobs out of the country yet allow them to sell their products in America. It is time we give tax breaks to companies that want to start and expand their companies here at home because American workers are still the best and most productive workers in the world.

It is time we invest in the education of our young people without them being burdened with enormous debts after finishing college. We cannot send our citizens into harms way and when they return home ignore their mental, physical, and employment needs. We have cared for our veterans in the past with the GI Bill and we will do it again, with or without you congress. Obama reminded them that our military forces are the greatest in the world by citing that special units who went after and took out Osama Bin Laden and other leaders of Al Qaeda making Americans safer.

He informed them he will not retreat from every American having access to health care or having citizens removed from insurance plans at the whim of executives. Every American deserves to be paid a decent wage and women paid equal pay for doing the same job as men.

His tone reminded me of when I played baseball and faced a new fastball pitcher who struck me out my first two times at bat. In between innings, I studied his motions, arm delivery and how he treated other batters. Needless to say my third time up there were two men on base and we were down one run in the eighth inning. I unloaded with a triple down the right field line. I did not try and pull him but went with the flow of his power. In the case of Obama he went with what they know and understand: I will use my power as president to care for this country with or without you. I will use executive authority.

If you want to send me bills that meet the needs of the American middle class and poor, I will sign them and this is not class warfare he stated. I was impressed with the tone and substance of his message.

Gigi Hanna for City Clerk

Voters of San Bernardino do not forget to return your vote by mail ballots for Gigi Hanna for San Bernardino City Clerk before February 7th.

California, Why Do We Treat The Future Generation So Bad?

E-mail Print PDF

Our children do not have a say on being born, who their parents and next of kin will be, whether they will take shots for better health, nor if they want to go to school or not. There are a lot of other things children have to do without having a say or choice in the decision, yet we expect them to participate in what we decide. We elect political leaders with or without children who sometimes use our children as political pawns on a chessboard.

This is currently what is happening with the state budget if voters do not agree to raise taxes. Our children’s education will suffer. This is horrible for a society of people who passed laws that our children must go to school or in some district the parents will be put in jail if the kids are not in school. We label them bad, irresponsible parents and child abusers.

On the federal level we have people running for president, who say if they are elected they would abolish the department of education. On many local levels, we have school boards who say pay me to serve with superintendents, administrators, teachers, classified employees saying pay me and rightfully so. We have some school grounds with no landscape, children walking farther and farther to get to school or no crossing guards to help small children cross busy and dangerous streets. We eliminate some extra curricular activities from the school agenda and tell them go and learn.

Now mind you corporations and other institutions of higher learning know how important comfort and environment plays in an employee performing well and being able to study and learn. Our stock market does not do well when uncertainty is in the air around their finances. Our gas prices go up when Iran or some other country in the Middle East makes a loud noise. Every time a new executive takes over a company, presidency, governorship, mayor, or school district, the first thing they want to do is make it comfortable for them by changing the environment.

All of these things are good and needed so why do we not want the same for the children we bring into the world and force to go to school. Why don’t we make it a law that our government must spend a certain portion on K-12 education regardless of how much money we take in, in taxes? We need to make sure that every business has to pay a certain portion of their profits toward education since this is the recruiting field for employees.

I am not advocating the same kind of public funding for higher learning because no law requires any adult to go to school, thus a different combination of public, private funding should be undertaken.

I bring this topic up because we refer to our children as the future generation with some parents working hard, saving money so they can leave their children an inheritance of some kind for a better life. Yet every year, we toss our children under the bus because of inability to manage the state budget. Our K-12 system of education deserves better than each year their teachers being faced with lay off notices, school boards being faced with having to cut from school extra curricular activities such as art or sports, or telling parents you must drive your kid to school because we do not have transportation or enough money to pay for crossing guards. And each year, the children are tasked with raising their own funds for extra curricular activities or events through school fundraisers and who suffers? Our kids today, may not know how to read, write, add or subtract effectively, but they do acquire great salesmanship skills.

I served on the school board of San Bernardino for twelve years and can recall only one time students came before us requesting something. They came to ask for lockers to put their heavy books in that we purchased, so they would not have to shoulder them around campus. We suggested they have their parents buy them backpacks. These were our top students that had done the proper research with the benefits of how this would help them be better students.

Now we have Governor Brown saying to us parents pay up or we will cut education instead of saying to the legislators, we are not going home until we solve permanent funding for our K-12 children of California out of the money we have. We will not treat our future generation like second class children.

Leadership Likened in San Bernardino Governing Body

E-mail Print PDF

Last week three young ladies, came into the office looking for my son to place an event they were having at Perris Hill Park on January 21st into the paper, to bring attention to the senseless killing of their classmate Keith Deshean Hall and the shooting of another classmate Army Specialist Christopher Sullivan. I am sure you recognize Sullivan’s name, as he was the recipient of a Purple Heart Award for being injured by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan and was attending a hero’s homecoming party. Someone at the family party pulled a gun out and shot Sullivan while engaged in an argument over a football game. Now Sullivan lay in the hospital paralyzed.

One of the young ladies, BeAnna Hamilton, said this is crazy and we have to do something. The “peace event” she calls it, is to focus attention on the violence and offer solutions in order to reduce these types of incidents in the city. She went on to say that the Police and Firefighters Association have signed on to help them as well as the Young Visionaries organization.

They are hoping to attract a large crowd who like them, are tired of people settling their differences with a gun.

I was hoping the mayor and city council members would embrace the youth’s gesture for peace but after watching the council meeting last Monday, it is clear they are in need of a peace event. The meeting began at 3 pm and ended at 11 pm with lots of verbal assaults, insults, accusations of dishonesty hurled at council members, Mayor Pat Morris, City Manager Charles McNeely and his staff from councilmember Wendy McCammack, and City Attorney Jim Penman.

McCammack and Penman got so angry they could not even sit in their seats, they went to the public podium and threw a barrage of words at their colleagues on the council and said it will be different when the new council member is sworn to office in March. Neither Penman nor McCammack wanted the council to approve Regal Cinemas movie theater in downtown, San Bernardino.

She was angry because a majority of the council would not join her making the staff give her requested information. They have an unwritten policy that when council members make a request that will involve a lot of staff time, at least four council members must agree to give the go signal to staff. So McCammack took her frustrations out on McNeely, the city manager.

Then later on the agenda, they needed a legal opinion from Penman regarding the city’s take over of the redevelopment agency’s $155 million properties and other investments done in the name of the city. Penman would not give the council-members a clear opinion but gave conversation that you might be sued if you take over without the states approval. The mayor and some council members argued that it would be irresponsible to allow another group or government be appointed to carry out the business in the city. After much name-calling they did seek to go on record to accept part of a motion presented to them by the staff of the redevelopment agency.

Another highlight in the meeting was that the newest council member, Robert Jenkins spoke and said he could not figure out how some members get information that the rest of them do not have. As an observer of the meetings, it appears to me that McCammack always brings up information, with research papers, regardless of the timeframe it is brought to the attention at the meeting. Usually it is in line with the city attorney’s thoughts on the subject.

I cite the antics of the council in light of our youth in the city seeking guidance and leadership from our elected officials. This past meeting was a bad example for our young people to follow on how to conduct oneself in making public policy. The city council and city attorney needs to get over the election and personal agendas and get down to governing the city. Our young people, businesses, and taxpayers deserve better.

Gov. Brown, Where Do The Black Citizens Fit In With Your Budget?

E-mail Print PDF

Our current governor Jerry Brown is searching for ways to solve the recurring state budget shortfall that has faced every governor for several decades. They have tried different strategies by shifting responsibilities from state to local government and back to state and now realignment. While they are shifting the public safety problem of overcrowded prisons to the local level, they striped redevelopment from their hands to help solve a one-year budget deficit. Our prisons have become overcrowded because of the three-strike law that landed more Blacks and Latinos in prison to be guarded by a white population. The question is where does the Black population fit into the business of public safety in the state’s budget?

Ever since 1972 when the government started documenting unemployment rates by race, the unemployment rate of Black Americans has been double that of White Americans. California is no exception with its current overall unemployment rate at 11.7% and Black Californians hovering at 15.7% unemployed and White Californians at 8 percent. There are many reasons given by experts that attempt to explain why the unemployment rate for Blacks is always higher than Whites including education, location, lack of specialized skills, etc.

In California we have over 37 million residents of which over 2.6 million, 7.2% of the population, are African Americans. We send 416,000 Black children, 6.7% of the student population, to public schools where only 59.0% graduate, over 30% drop-out before graduation, and where 96% of the teachers do not look like them. This is not a reason for our students to drop-out but one has to wonder about the business aspect of our education system and the Black community. So the question is where does the Black community fit into the business side of education of the budget?

The governor had to cut some services from his budget and those cuts hit our community harder than any other community because of health care needs and services. These cuts hurt the very ones who had given so much to the success of our state when they were in their prime years, working, and paying taxes. These senior citizens are still living in the inner cities because racial discrimination prevented them in the past from earning higher wages to propel their ability to move into senior citizen communities. Yet, these same citizens will be asked to vote to raise their taxes if Sacramento should have it’s way in June. So my question to the governor is where will the services and business opportunities fit into your plan for the Black residents of California.

According to the latest information I was able to find on the number of Black owned businesses in California at 138,891 we stand ready to help build and push the state into the black. These firms come in all categories from agriculture, construction, retail, transportation, information technology, finance, science, education, health care, real estate, marketing, advertising and entertainment and more.

Now in order to motivate the voters to support anything that resembles more money coming out of their pockets, they are saying, “What is it for and what is in it for me?” Everyone who pays taxes is a special interest group and African Americans are no exception. I remember several years ago a large medical group asking a Los Angeles council member for his support and he responded back, “What have you done for me lately?”

So the question to the governor is, “What have you done for the African American community that would warrant the voters to follow your lead?”

The Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1863

E-mail Print PDF

The United States, engaged in a civil war, North vs. South to determine the direction of this country to remain a nation of Black citizens in slavery or Black citizens becoming freemen. The south wanted to keep this free labor of Blacks while the north was trying to preserve the union and join other European nations that had abolished slavery. Many Blacks heard that this was going to happen but did not know when. It is said that just like the Jews being set free by Pharaoh of Egypt, there was much excitement and high anxiety on plantations and other places that Blacks congregated. It was like children waiting for Christmas morning to come so they can open gifts. But unlike the Jews annual celebration of the Passover of freedom and children celebrating Christmas for gifts; Black Americans do not celebrate their day of Emancipation in 1863, so we forget.

I was reminded of this by Pastor Larry Campbell’s special “Watch Night Service” to be held at St. Paul AME Church on the evening of December 31st. To that end, I am printing the document President Abraham Lincoln signed into law. It is irrelevant as to whether he wanted to or not because Pharaoh did not want the Jews released either.

By the President of the United States of America:
A Proclamation.

Whereas, on the twenty-second day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-two, a proclamation was issued by the President of the United States, containing, among other things, the following, to wit:

"That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.

"That the Executive will, on the first day of January aforesaid, by proclamation, designate the States and parts of States, if any, in which the people thereof, respectively, shall then be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any State, or the people thereof, shall on that day be, in good faith, represented in the Congress of the United States by members chosen thereto at elections wherein a majority of the qualified voters of such State shall have participated, shall, in the absence of strong countervailing testimony, be deemed conclusive evidence that such State, and the people thereof, are not then in rebellion against the United States."

Now, therefore I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, by virtue of the power in me vested as Commander-in-Chief, of the Army and Navy of the United States in time of actual armed rebellion against the authority and government of the United States, and as a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion, do, on this first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and in accordance with my purpose so to do publicly proclaimed for the full period of one hundred days, from the day first above mentioned, order and designate as the States and parts of States wherein the people thereof respectively, are this day in rebellion against the United States, the following, to wit:

Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, (except the Parishes of St. Bernard, Plaquemines, Jefferson, St. John, St. Charles, St. James Ascension, Assumption, Terrebonne, Lafourche, St. Mary, St. Martin, and Orleans, including the City of New Orleans) Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia, (except the forty-eight counties designated as West Virginia, and also the counties of Berkley, Accomac, Northampton, Elizabeth City, York, Princess Ann, and Norfolk, including the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth[)], and which excepted parts, are for the present, left precisely as if this proclamation were not issued.

And by virtue of the power, and for the purpose aforesaid, I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States, are, and henceforward shall be free; and that the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.

And I hereby enjoin upon the people so declared to be free to abstain from all violence, unless in necessary self-defence; and I recommend to them that, in all cases when allowed, they labor faithfully for reasonable wages.

And I further declare and make known, that such persons of suitable condition, will be received into the armed service of the United States to garrison forts, positions, stations, and other places, and to man vessels of all sorts in said service.

And upon this act, sincerely believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, upon military necessity, I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind, and the gracious favor of Almighty God.

In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

Done at the City of Washington, this first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty three, and of the Independence of the United States of America the eighty-seventh.

By the President: ABRAHAM LINCOLN 
WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.

Page 18 of 123

BVN National News Wire