A+ R A-

Hardy L. Brown

San Bernardino Police Officers Association is Out of Control

E-mail Print PDF

Last week the voters in the City of San Bernardino were sent a mailer from their Police Officers Association stating: “Your tax dollars are still being collected” followed by the question “where is the money going?” It went on to outline that Measure YY and Measure Z passed by the voters was to ensure the public safety of its citizens while implementing more crime intervention and prevention programs.

It also went on to name the leaders they believe are responsible for the recent increase in crime as well as bankrupting the city. They laid it at the feet of Mayor Pat Morris and City Councilmembers Wendy McCammack, Fred Shorett, Virginia Marquez, and Rikke Van Johnson. The mailer did not include Councilmembers Chas Kelley, John Valdivia or Robert Jenkins with whom they have had in their hip pocket by running and financing their political campaigns. According to Forms 460 of their campaign statements, public safety associations have contributed 98.3% to Valdivia’s and 93.8% to Jenkins’ political campaigns and lesser percentages to Kelley, Penman, and McCammack.

Now the mailer is correct, the citizens are still paying the bills through utility, sales, property, business, and special assessment taxes to help finance the city. However, the public safety employees of police and firefighters are not paying their fair share.

In my opinion, to answer the question asked by the association of where the money is going, the city budget indicates that public safety takes over 75% of the budget. According to several different reports, many officers earn over $100,000 a year. Over 90% of these officers live in other communities and take over $40 million dollars out of the city each year. This is where the money is going.

Yes, I am aware that the police budget took a 10% cut, but so have other departments within the city government. Some departments have been combined and volunteers are currently cleaning public parks. Some libraries have been closed and open hours reduced. Trash pick up services have been reshuffled while potholes and weeds are growing in our streets.

I had the opportunity to talk with a San Bernardino-based small business owner about the problems facing the city. He said that for starters the city should be more business friendly beginning with the city business licensure and planning departments, and added that the police department needs to be more positive when interacting with the public. He shared his personal experience of being faced with a public safety problem only to be told, “what do you expect, you live in San Bernardino,” by the employees of his police department. This man lives and employs 10 people in the city and should not be treated this way.

The Police Officers Association did not blame Kelley, Jenkins, or Valdivia for the city’s bankruptcy because these three are the ringleaders running key department heads and managers out of the city at the direction of the police and firefighter associations, plus Kelley needs a job and wants to run for mayor.

In my opinion, these public safety associations are out of control and their services should be put out for contract with outside agencies for better service at a lower cost.

One Should at Least Believe the Evidence of the San Bernardino School District

E-mail Print PDF

Some of you have questioned my opinion for laying some blame of the lack of African American student achievement on San Bernardino School Board Member Danny Tillman and have responded that there is no evidence that our students, and especially African American students, are at the bottom. That feedback brought to mind one of my favorite scriptures: John 14:11, which is about the disciples not believing the evidence of witnessing the miracles that were performed.

For the record, I have strongly supported Danny each and every time he has run for office and when some members in the community began to attack him, I counseled him on how to approach the issue. Now one might have a problem with me as the messenger, but you cannot ignore the message.

That being said, I want to document some of the evidence as recorded by the California Department of Education regarding San Bernardino students. This is in no way a condemnation on the district because there are a lot of good things happening. The district has some new board members President Mike Gallo and Margaret Hill and a new superintendent Dr. Dale Marsden that have committed themselves to providing positive leadership for us to follow. So we should give them adequate time to point this district on the road to success. I am pointing out that when one wants to seek a higher level of public responsibility make sure you at least evaluate your evidence.

We all have heard or at least are familiar with the Academic Performance Index (API) score that is one of the indicators of how well our children are doing in school. A statewide base line score of 800 has been established as a student performing well. As a former school board member I have personal knowledge that these indicators are a basis and not gospel as to how well a district is doing with our children.

A snapshot of student performance in San Bernardino in three critical areas:

API scores:
Blacks 687
Latinos 723
Whites 788
Asians 832

Remember 800 is the baseline score everyone is trying to reach.

Cohort dropout rate:
Blacks 18.8%
Latinos 14.8%
Whites 14.7%
Asians 14.3%

So the question is what is the acceptable number of students who dropout of school?

Graduation rates:
Blacks 67.8%
Latinos 73.7%
Whites 76.3%
Asians 78.6%

This shows that for every 100 Black students attending school over 30 of them will not get a high school diploma.

Without a diploma, these students will find that decent employment is out of reach for them and with a 12.4% unemployment rate in the city and employers seeking candidates with some college education, these students are doomed.

Yes, this is my opinion. You might not believe me, but at least believe the documented evidence.

San Bernardino City Citizens Might be Justified for Recall

E-mail Print PDF

When most people hear the word recall, they think consumer protection of faulty or defective products being removed from the market place for public safety. The actions by these companies cost millions of dollars but not as much in public confidence if no recall is taken. In the short run, they take a hit but it sends a message to the public you can trust us.

Now we have citizens in the City of San Bernardino saying we have had enough of misguided leadership from the current and past mayors, city attorney, some council members and the public safety employee associations, specifically the police and firefighters. I heard last week that some prominent citizens in San Bernardino began a petition to recall the San Bernardino mayor, city attorney, and the entire city council. To some people this might seem to be drastic, while others might be asking, “what took them so long?”

Back in the early 70’s, I had some personal involvement in one recall. As a matter of fact, I cut my political teeth on that recall and the Westside Action Group (WAG) was born. Also in San Bernardino during the 70’s five school board members were swept from office during a recall election over the issue of bussing. In recent California history, Governor Gray Davis was recalled from office and Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected governor. Presently, a group of citizens in Fontana gathered enough signatures to move forward to recall two members of the school board. That election will take place this summer.

Past mayors gave away the shop including inappropriate use of redevelopment funds by investing in bad projects and not using the funds as they were supposed to be used. City leaders have allowed outside investors from Japan and Spain to buy prime downtown properties that now sit empty and bring down the value of other businesses in the city. According to the city attorney, who is supposed to be the “watchdog” of our local government and who helped agree to these actions, there is nothing the city can do.

The current council and city attorney seem beholden to the public safety associations who fund their campaigns. These elected officials will not vote against any changes in these departments which consume over 73% of the city’s budget with 90% of them living in other cities which amounts to $40 million leaving the city. These public safety employees pay no property taxes to the city, pay no utility taxes to the city, pay no sales taxes in the city, do not educate their children in the city, yet they tell the council how to vote against the best interest of their citizens.

The mayor appears to be afraid to veto any actions approved by the council that he knows is not in the best interest of the city. Thus businesses are hesitant to move into or do business in the city. I have also heard of business leaders being afraid to speak out because some of the city’s elected officials are vindictive and will take action against them or any project they might bring before the council. This is absurd and the mayor and city manager should direct any employee that is approached by any elected official to report it to them so this kind of action can be brought out into the open. No employee should be afraid to report such actions.

One might ask why has it taken so long to take out recall petitions? I think it is because concerned citizens now realize the city is not safer even with these high public safety salaries. They also have watched the poverty rate rise and the unemployment rate remain higher than other cities around them. And it is their property values going down, as their neighbors are moving out of the city.

These residents are saying their city is worth fighting for: this city they raised their children up in; this city that their mothers and fathers help build; where they went to visit grandparents and play in the yards and even the streets without fear of being gunned down by a stray bullet or hit by an under the influence driver. This city that allowed them to establish law firms, medical practices, have thriving hospitals, profitable auto dealerships; the city that President Lyndon B. Johnson worked in as an elevator operator; the city that provided Sammy Davis Jr. with lifesaving healthcare; and the city that birthed McDonald’s, the food services innovator and one of the most recognizable brands in the world.

In my opinion, these citizens have in their mind enough justifiable reasons to recall these elected officials. They are saying we must turn this city around and in the words of Malcolm X, “by any means necessary.”

Pete Aguilar for the 31st Congressional Seat in 2014

E-mail Print PDF

The race for the 31st Congressional seat in 2014 has already drawn many democratic contenders to run. The seat is currently occupied by Republican Gary Miller. Miller has the money but democrats have the majority voters in the district and for all practical purposes the right candidate should get elected without much effort. However that is easily said than becoming a reality as the last election showed us.

Currently we have Mayor of Redlands, Pete Aguilar who was born and raised on the west side of San Bernardino where his parents told family members that in order to make it in America they must learn and speak English as their primary language. He did as his parents told him and got a good education that allowed him to grow up and lead one of our premier cities in the Inland Empire. Not bad for a Latino boy from the west side of town where he also worked with his blind grandfather in the family business.

This diverse community of African Americans and Hispanics with his family experience taught him how to relate to all people and has propelled him to lead Redland’s citizens as mayor and council member. He led all Democratic contenders in the June 2012 election but came in third behind two Republicans because four democrats split up their votes. The National Democratic Party has already committed to helping Aguilar which he has said yes to their support.

Also we have former congressional member Joe Baca who was defeated by Gloria Negrete McLeod in 2012 for the 35th Congressional seat. Joe decided to move from Rialto to Fontana so he would not have to run against his republican friend Gary Miller. The voters in this new district heard of Joe using his office as a personal bully club and rejected his family style of representation and his close relationship with the National Rifle Association.

Next we have Danny Tillman of the San Bernardino School Board who is talking about running for the seat. Tillman has been elected to the school board for four terms and we have witnessed the decline in test scores and high dropout rate in the African American student population. He has to take responsibility for that decline even though some movement is being made.

I know that Tillman is being giving advice by a losing candidate Renea Wickman who believes that being African American should be a part of the qualifying criteria for seeking office. The voters an myself have rejected that kind of thinking even though the candidate should be inclusive of all people that they represent.

Last we have Eloise Reyes, Esq. talking about exploring a shot at running for congress. She is a very successful attorney and has expressed an interest of being appointed a Superior Court Judge. Maybe she changed that line of thinking and wants to make public law instead of interpreting public law. I am not sure if she is aware of the effort, time, money and commitment it takes to seek a seat in congress.

In my opinion, I believe every citizen has the right to run for office just like I did when I ran for the school board. Having said that, all candidates need to know what they are up against, why they are running, what they hope to accomplish and have some plan as to how they might pull it off.

From what I know thus far, Pete Aguilar has all of those things I just mentioned and more because he has garnered the support of many leaders in the district and the National Democratic Party, plus he has my support for what it is worth. Pete will provide the leadership our district needs.

Norma Torres For 32nd District Senate Seat

E-mail Print PDF

With the election of Gloria Negrete McLeod to the 35th Congressional District, her former state senate seat became vacant and as of Monday, early voting began to fill this vacancy. On the ballot for the position are Assembly Member Norma Torres (D) of Pomona and Paul Leon (R) of Ontario.

Both individuals have local government experience - serving on city council and serving as mayor of their respective cities. Torres has additionally served her district well as a member of the state assembly since 2008.

While both candidates have similar backgrounds at the local government level, in my opinion the edge would go to Torres with her Assembly experience. And with the Democrats in control of the Senate, Assembly and executive branch of our government, she will have a greater chance of being heard in bringing our regions issues to the top of the state’s agenda.

I know Torres will continue in the fine tradition of female senators that started with Nell Soto and continued with Negrete McLeod. In her current position Torres serves on the Economic Development and Job Creation Committee, Housing & Community Development Committee, and the Banking & Finance Committee. She has the full support of labor unions and the Democratic Party.

The 32nd Senate District serves the communities of San Bernardino, Rialto, Fontana, Ontario, Colton, Montclair, Bloomington, Muscoy and Pomona. So citizens living in these cities must exercise their civic duty and vote.

Our district is in great need of good paying jobs that will sustain families above the poverty level. Our local cities need help recovering from current financial hardships. Our educational institutions are in need of attention and Torres will help with that as well.

I am recommending that the voters in the 32nd Senate District vote and elect Norma Torres.

Page 3 of 121

Quantcast