(NNPA) If you’ve watched any of the Republican debates, you’ll remember Ron Paul, the 76-year-old libertarian congressman from Texas whose oversized suit coats look like they are about to fall off his frail shoulders. You’ll also remember that no debate questioner asked him about the overtly racist views that appeared in his newsletters for two decades.
But now that Paul has surged to front-runner status in Iowa, he is being grilled about comments that range from denigrating Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to objecting to passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
In the 1990s, he described Dr. King as a “world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours” and “seduced underage girls and boys.” He even claimed – without a hint of proof – that Dr. King “made a pass at” fellow civil rights warrior Ralph Abernathy, who succeeded King as president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC).
When Ronald Reagan signed the Martin Luther King Holiday bill into law, Paul wrote, “What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it!” He added, “We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.”
The controversial remarks were published in various for-profit Ron Paul newsletters in the 1980s and 1990s. The newsletters included: Ron Paul’s Political Report, Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, Ron Paul’s Survival Report and the Ron Paul’s Investment Letter.
On January 8, 2008, The New Republic ran an article on Paul titled, “Angry White Man.” It was accompanied by an illustration of Paul wearing a confederate necktie and rebel hat. The story, written by James Kirchick, noted that Ron Paul’s newsletters were published on a monthly basis from 1978 to at least 1999. Most are on file in the right-wing extremists literature collections at the Wisconsin Historical Society and the University of Kansas.
Here are some excerpts from the newsletters, which were said to earn Paul at least $1million a year:
· After the uprising in Watts, the Ron Paul Political Report said in June 1992, “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began.”
· According to the newsletter, the uprising was caused by government-backed “’civil rights,’ quotas, mandated hiring preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black tv shows, black tv anchors, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.”
· “*… If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-age male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be,” one report said.
· According to a newsletter bearing Paul’s name, “…Opinion polls consistently show only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions.”
· The late congresswoman Barbara Jordon of Texas was called the “archetypical half-educated victimologist.”
· I* a December 1989 edition of Ron Paul’s Investment Letter, it was predicted that “Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities.” According to the publication, “…Mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white ‘haves.’” · I* In June 1991, following a racial incident in the Adams Morgan section of Washington, D.C., one headline screamed, “Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo.”
· I* In October of 1992, a newsletter bearing Paul’s name stated, “I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming.”
· “* Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of black males in that city are semi-criminal if not entirely criminal,” one Ron Paul newsletter asserts.
· * Praising former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke in 1990, Ron Paul said through his newsletter that “our priority should be to take the anti-government, anti-tax, anti-crime, anti-welfare loafers, anti-race-privilege, anti-foreign meddling message of Duke, and enclose it in a more consistent package of freedom.”
Ron Paul’s venom was not limited to his newsletters. While many were celebrating the 40th anniversary of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in 2004, Ron Paul was still objecting to it, saying June 4, 2004 on the floor of Congress, “…the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty.”
Incredulously, Ron Paul wants us to believe that not only did he not write the un-bylined racist comments in the newsletters that carried his name, but that he was unaware they appeared in his publications.
“I didn’t write them, I didn’t read them at the time, and I disavow them,” he told Gloria Borger of CNN. “I never read that stuff. I was probably unaware of it 10 years after it was written, and it’s been going on 20 years that people have pestered me about this. CNN does it every single time. When are you going to wear yourself out?”
When Borger continued to press Paul, he abruptly terminated the interview. “These are pretty incendiary,” she told Paul. Unclipping his microphone, he said, “Only because of people like you.”
No, only because of Ron Paul’s documented record of racism.
George E. Curry, former editor-in-chief of Emerge magazine and the NNPA News Service, is a keynote speaker, moderator, and media coach. He can be reached through his Web site, www.georgecurry.com You can also follow him at www.twitter.com/currygeorge.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|





Comments
What is it GEORGE E CURRY? Are you a PUNK or a MAN?
I am thinking PUNK. as in a politically correct liberal Hack PUNK. The kind of LAZY ASS Journalist who gets all his own THINKING from some White LIBERAL with an agenda to smear the ONLY NON Racists in the GOP race!
What do you have to say for yourself Mr. Curry? Are you going to Man Up and apologize? You know, the kind of thing that YOU SHOULD WHEN YOU ARE 100% wrong.
The Fact that Doctor Paul has decided long ago to disavow WORDS that were NOT his and even condemn them because he did not want to take on the Liberal PC police, does not excuse you from what you have done. So Apologize like a man or PROVE your case.
"They are, however, outnumbered. Of black males in Washington, D.C, between the ages of 18 and 35, 42% are charged with a crime or are serving a sentence,
reports the National Center on Institutions and Alternatives. The Center also reports that 70% of all black men in Washington are arrested before they reach the age of 35, and 85% are arrested at some point in their
lives. Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the "criminal justice system," I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."
“Indeed, it is shocking to consider the uniformity of opinion among blacks in this country. Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty, and the end of welfare and affirmative action. I know many who fall into this group personally and they deserve credit--not as
representatives of a racial group, but as decent people.
--- READ the WHOLE speech. As someone who lived through the 1960's & 70's, I can tell you that FORCED BUSING was not appreciated at all by EITHER the blacks or the Whites. People LIKE their schools to be close to them. Busing now has been effectively ended FOR THIS REASON. SO Paul is correct.
Next, Ron Paul and RAND PAUL like all libertarians base their geopolitical philosophy upon the sanctity of Individual Rights of Man. The problem they have is with just ONE of the many planks within the Civil Rights act. They are DELIGHTED that the act got rid of government JIM CROW LAWS which their philosophy calls evil.
"Venom? There was no RON PAUL "VENOM" towards people of color, minorities. The ONLY "venom" was reserved for thugs-criminals-gansters- ie the very same that Jesse Jackson was condemning at the time. Recall that "car-jacking" and crack cocaine was a "new phenomenon" at the time. Recall that the Rodney King riots AND the Chicago Bulls victory riots happened at this time.
--NO. The Ron Paul Newsletter SPECIFICALLY DID NOT PRAISE David Duke. Rather, it stated that this former KKK racist got his high votes not for his racism, but rather for the good SENSIBLE political opinions, ie Free Market, low tax & spend, anti-crime and anti-foreign wars policies. Again, context is INTENTIONALLY not provided. Its a race baiting smear by THE NEW REPUBLICS author. It working because of fools like George Curry.
--No, the study that the newsletter identified asserts this. And if the context was provided, one would see that the victimless crimes laws, drugs & prostiituion which the newsletter was for LEGALIZING did not think well of the 'semi-criminal" charge. But again, TNR is not about to provide context, they have an SMEARING political agenda of which George Curry is all to willing to help out. Thanks for nothing George! The one Politician who is against the Death Penalty and Drug Wars - institutionalized racism, you turn out against. Wow, with brothas like you Pres Obama, Nixon's Drug War will never go away.
This is a republican conservative investment newsletter. Do you expect them to be ANTI-GUN? Shoot "animals" ie thugs, criminals doing VIOLENCE to steal your stuff or hurt you in some way. This is typical advice for any republican newsletter. But if you are TNR liberal rag, its "scary".
Reader beware. This is so jumbled up from '89 to a letter in '91 that its MADE to look bad. Still it is NOT racist. There is NO CONTEXT.
Again, ZERO racism there. ZERO. ZILCH. The same can be said for AL SHARPTON who has made his career out of being a archetypical half-educated victimologist. Any self respecting educated NON-LIBERAL black person certainly does NOT let Al Sharpton speak for them. But that is just it. The liberals are now using "racism" as a political weapon, its called race-baiting, and it works so long as we never define our terms and just use the vague and wide PC version. The reason so many conservatives, white ones especially, liked Herman Cain, is because he did not fall for this Political Correctness from the liberal left. He could call a spade a spade in this world of vague Political Correctness of "multicultural sensitivities" , and ironically because he was black, get away with it. For that we loved him.
Nothing racist about that. If I say, only 9% of American Japanese have sensible political opinions, that is not racist. Again, look what the definition of racism is. Its sad and worrisome that a George Curry does not know what IS and what is NOT "racist". Perhaps bigotry is the problem. Especially bigoted liberals, particularly black liberals seeing a old white conservative and THINKING anything said about minorities is "racist". That is bigotry. When a sentence says "only 14% of Mexican Americans have sensible immigration opinions" one must ask, what does the writer MEAN by "sensible". That Curry fails to find out, which is silly, irresponsible and HURTFUL to the person you are throwing the "racist" charge too.
Turn up the speakers! Hear him straight from his own mouth! Not from some ghostwriter when he was busy delivering 2000 babies.
Here is Paul's "Racist" rant:
http://[censored].youtube.com/watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY
He is PRO-WAR in Afganistan and IRAQ and IRAN and perhaps Syria too.
He is PRO WAR in Lybia and did it without Congress approval
He is PRO-DRUG WAR (more institutional racism)
He is PRO-GITMO our own American Gulag system of prisons
He is PRO- Killing Americans without trial
He is PRO-WAR against IRAN (what the hell have they done?)
He is PRO-IRAQ war -- lied getting us out in 9 months.
He Is PRO IRAQ war-- We were thrown out of Iraq & Obama tried desperately to STAY IN IRAQ
He signed all of the Bush Tax Cuts.
He raised the DEBT ceiling -- something he criticized GWBush for doing.
He SPENT like a drunk, something he criticized GWBush for doing.
He resigned the PATRIOT ACT which takes away our civil rights.
Racism is rare among young people because they are cultured differently. Government may and does have involvement in the way it cultures the people. But ultimately people create the culture, not the hegemony of the government.
"How do you think 'WE the people' can 'stand up and discipline the immoral' if 'WE the people' can't even stand up and organize a trip to the polling place to vote the rascals out?" I never said it would be a walk in the park. But Ron Paul has been spreading the good message, and it seems to be taking hold.
Meanwhile, though, it's certainly ironic to read complaints about 'so much faith in the government' which exists, after all, only because voters - 'everyday people,' in your words - have either voted it into office or failed to vote it out - from someone who has 'so much faith in the' exact same voters who are [ir]responsible for the system we have. How do you think 'WE the people' can 'stand up and discipline the immoral' if 'WE the people' can't even stand up and organize a trip to the polling place to vote the rascals out? Talk about naïve . . .
In the real world, the media is misrepresenting the facts, they sum up a complicated issue into three words, and the government is corrupt. I do not disagree that WE ought to do something. But that "WE" should not be in any imaginable way the government politicians. It should be the everyday people who care. Government cannot change the biases and morals of people. Only PEOPLE can change the biases and morals of people. You want government, to use Paul's terms, to "protect us from cradle to grave". If you think there is no racism because of government, you're dead wrong. Only WE the people, NOT the politicians, can make that change. Stop having so much faith in the government.
Ron Paul did not terminate the interview. The interview was already over. He was frustrated that people are pestering him about this because he's being labeled as a racist. He's far from it.
Ron Paul believes in INDIVIDUAL liberty not GROUP liberty. Groups don't have rights; individuals do. What Ron Paul is saying is that the GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT prefer one group over another, based on the color of their skin, sexual preference, gender, etc. But if we encounter forms of racism, sexism, or discrimination based on sexual preference, then WE, the people, NOT the government, ought to do something about it. WE, the people, must stand up and discipline the immoral. It is NOT the burden of the government to do so.
Sorry, but red herrings about Israeli can't distract from the stench.
No such dissonance or introspection is displayed or examined, just stenography.
This article is weak.
Please. Cynical opportunist. You don't care about racism.